Jump to content

? servers

? players online

All Ts

Banned
  • Posts

    4441
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by All Ts

  1. c9 Roster Change

    Two on the left look well groomed with good hygiene, obvious choice to remove them.
  2. Not for adding this to anything but maybe ZE, rest of the servers in my expirence most of the guys that come on with HLDJ, SLAM, etc.. don't use it excessively and the ones that do are muted/banned very quickly. I personally have no problem with the little SoundClips or playing things like the Cha Cha slide on occasion so I could view it differently than others.
  3. Yep, definitely think a PB mapping competition would be awesome. I have a map that's like 2/5 done, I'd gladly spend time finishing it for something like this.
  4. Post your desktops!

  5. JB

    At the current moment I think this is a bad idea due to the amount of staff we currently have and splitting up our population.
  6. @Wawa @Jake @Delirium @Nimmy @Mad Dogg @Paralyzed @frosty
  7. Ah fuck man, you didn't have to post this here I'm sure noone would move this. If you want we can move it out. I didn't always like eciD cause he was a massive troll, but I had some seriously good conversations with the dude when he was being chill and he seemed like a good dude. Really sorry to hear that this happened and if you need people to bullshit with I'm dead serious when I say that you can hit me up to just to talk. You and him seemed to have been really good friends for a long time and I really am sorry this happened. If you need anything let me know man. EDIT: hah, yeet
  8. This video is just around the time I quit league, it explains why league can be such an enraging piece of shit game and honestly it carries over to many if not all other competitive games for me. Save yourself the stress and just don't play video games competitively, play them for fun.
  9. "Mecha-Hitler" A Trilogy showcasing the thrilling adventures of a cynical internet terrorist turned loving family man who struggles to escape his past of feeding babies to hungry wolves & stealing lollipops from little kids. The New York Times: "Marvelous, from the ceiling fan to the rope." San Francisco Examiner: "Unpretentious, tough, funny but why the fuck did I read this?" Harper's Magazine: "Manipulative, shockingly biased and a complete asshole. It's hard not to love him."
  10. Basically what I'm trying to say is that it's going to turn into a "wow, this person won member of the month and not me", and upon that even if you try to make it marginally less about popularity by making it so certain staff voted you would still end up with people being spiteful, biased, fake, and afterwards probably less productive. It sounds dumb but I can guarantee you adding something like this is going to end in alot of resentment, and a lot of cocksucking. If you don't believe me, and I know this sounds silly go look up why a lot of companies don't use Employee of the Month type systems anymore.
  11. To be honest, something like this in my opinion is only going to encourage people to fake as fuck and non-productive. Something that at SG we don't need any help with.
  12. Armory wasn't spawning weapons for me, and volleyball had no volleyball. Would probably fix both to add it onto the server though. Map looked massive, but also pretty promising- has the Cha Cha slide in Disco which is pretty cool.
  13. I'm gonna have 4 scoops tonight in honor of my man Rich.
  14. He's actually finger painting, it's pretty cool.
  15. @shoiep is on it and it looks terrific.
  16. BUT WHOS GONNA UPDATE THE SERVERS
  17. @Delirium @Nimmy @Jake Remove this for now cause it's pretty inaccurate and I'll remake something in the next week or so?
  18. @Delirium @Nimmy @Jake
  19. I think its a good idea, would be willing to make the award if you could give me some type of idea of what you wanted. Gonna tag @Post and @shoiep aswell. EDIT: @Greggy G Isn't a potential issue here that ZE constantly readds and removes maps and it inflates the list a lot?
  20. The reasoning within that thread by itself is narrow-minded to that if we already have an admin protocol we should just stick to banning people globally when we have other suitable options that don't harm our servers by unnecessarily banning players from all of them. Sure we have an admin protocol, but aren't we supposed to resort to banning people when we feel we've done all we can? 1. Having to ban someone removes them from all our servers, and it hurts population. If we can stop people from breaking the rules without actually globally banning them we should. 2. Admins are not constantly on the server, these bans could serve to keep shit intact when admins aren't online and hence make our regulars lives A LOT easier. 3. This would be not different from protocol whatsoever. If someone isn't following the rules get rid of them for X amount of time. 4. As stated on that thread ZE SA's were using the command incorrectly by removing the ability to use items from players due to them using them the wrong way, not due to actually breaking the rules. This doesn't speak for all our admins- but just a few fuckups. Even if you believe it's a trend we could still give this to just CA+. 5. Restricting a player for breaking rules is fine, that's basically what you do when you ban them flat-out and I see no reason why for someone making small offenses on PB such as conflicting orders, forcing deathgames, freekilling, screaming on mic, etc.. why we shouldn't have ANOTHER option to deal with them while admins aren't online. If you think this isn't needed I encourage you to go undercover at peak server time with NO admins online so you can understand how our regulars feel. I know you already know this, but to add to the point you made/not ignore the possible cons and be completely objective I'd like to say this. A CT sided ban is really just an extra tool to stop people from breaking the rules without getting rid of them completely. If anything if you ban them from CT and they continue being a shit for brains on T side at least by that point they would probably be showing a lot of intent in the case they appeal or complain like children. Basically what I'm saying is that it's not necessary to make any special protocol as admins can simply go about their business and use this punishment as they would use a ban normally except for the cases where someone is being a clear minge you can just issue them a normal ban.
  21. Will take a look tomorrow, but I'm fairly sure as long as it's not trapping your team for the remainder of the round it's not a problem.
  22. @ExRev @LampShade @Wawa Apologies for the shitty font/colors, didn't look like that on paint and I was in a rush. Picture #1 says: These 3 are far too lenient, those should all be red. It easily lets someone bhop or sprint to secrets. Picture #2 says: These 2 should absolutely be blatantly disobeying, one is completely out of the realm- the other is close to 2-3 secrets which can let them get to armory. Picture #3 says: In the other pictures you can get warning shot for being near secrets, but here being 3-4 steps out of big cage is KOS. Picture #4 says: The orders on this one are no past first cell, but you can be warning shot for being well within the orders, then you can get killed for being only a few steps past first cell towards the buttons..
×
×
  • Create New...