Manny

What Loki said pretty much perfectly sums up how I feel about this. It's not supposed to be 100% true to matchmaking nor do I want to take the server in that direction. Along with all the other negatives that come with turning molly damage on, team damage, throwing, trolling, I don't see the need to change this.

I guess I just got lucky for when I was on today. I'll continue looking for a permanent fix.

To my knowledge this hasn't happened after I switched to another map chooser plugin. Notify me if this still occurs tho

grat

8/23/19 Hello everyone, a quick update on the rules regarding Chat Orders. With this rule change, we feel like this will mitigate the issue of conflicting orders and the confusion it tends to cause a lot of the times. With this new rule introduction, we're hoping this cuts back on the misunderstandings caused by CTs & Ts alike not reading the chat and will lead to fewer freekills occurring. We also would like to amend a current rule in regards to Last Request: New Rule: Old Rule: With this rule change, we feel like this can also help the CTs remain control in instances where a T may be running off during their LR and the CT can't really do anything other than chasing them down.

The reason it's 5v5 right now is to keep it similar to a real comp "simulation." That's the whole point of Retakes imo, get to learn the map, angles, and how to play in certain situations like 1v3s. Making it 6v6 or 7v7 is making it super arcade-like and something we won't be considering at this time or probably ever. Rejected

Added in place of v1. Tell us how it goes.

hmmmm

SOON™

Introducing our new Retakes server! I'm excited to announce that we are releasing a new Retakes server! Together, @Cept For Her and I will be managing the server and are very pleased to be bringing this to you all! Our hope is that you will all be interested in the server and enjoy yourselves, but we are also very eager to see if we can bring in a new set of dedicated players to the server and community. We are open to suggestions for the server, but as of now we feel as though we've put it together in the best way possible. We truly believe that this is a step in the right direction and think it will be beneficial to the community as a whole. We hope to see you on! IP: 104.153.107.38:27015

@Pred Where is @Burst, when you need him the most?

Alright, I'm going to wrap this up. Refer to my post here: https://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=91724&p=1009729&viewfull=1#post1009729, for the official ruling on this matter. TL;DR: The order posed in the OP is allowed, since the rule in question fulfills it's purpose, and there is no consideration to change the wording in the rule or disallow freedays until a certain time.

People who vote for Frost are the same people that like the warm side of the pillow.

. Also, can you stop saying stuff like this?? I get that it's your interpretation but constantly saying with certainty, when in fact it's very much not, that a rule isn't allowed could have the potential to misguide a ton of players on and off the servers. It's better if you say that you feel like it shouldn't be allowed and then present why you feel that way, but I'm getting tired of seeing you constantly go in threads and say something is one way when nothing has been confirmed or clarified. This goes for everyone as well...

Like Dom mentioned earlier, the reason we implemented the "no freeday while !fo", is due to it's conflicting nature with our rule that "freedays can be revoked at any time." There's really no need for any sort of re-wording or rule change. Just reading through some of the responses, and it seems like you guys want to change something for practically nothing. It seems like you all even want to make it way harder for the CTs to maintain control, because the way I see it, if a CT gives an order like "after fo i'll give a freeday" this only helps the CTs because they can have time to prepare to revoke the order. While, if we were to push out a rule change to fix the problem stated in the OP, then what'll most likely happen is, someone takes !fo and gives their order, then immediately one 4:30 hits, they give a freeday and the CTs aren't prepared nor ready or capable to revoke it and maintain order. I'd rather have the CTs be foward with each other and their intent on the next orders they intend to give, as opposed pushing out orders at random, which often lead to mass confusion and conflicting. The way this thread is going, I can't see any need for any rule amending, because the current rule fulfills it's purpose to the best of it's nature along with the reasons mentioned above. I'll let the discussion to continue, if there is more to be said, but right now you'd have to bring up some good points with actual examples to sway my opinion in a different direction.

I know whos not getting my vote next CA round...

I will remember this.

A vote for me is a vote for the bag

My Apple AirPods™ 2 case

Sometimes it feels like you the only real one out here...

Hey buddy, wanta explain who @Burst is?