TheZZL

The post also implies not to continuously kill T's who are getting gunplanted in a stack from a CT killing that T.

Literally thought we just had a big discussion about this, I'll go dig up the post. Edit: Here you go @delirium https://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=89793&page=2 . As @jim recently stated, not all specific rules and anecdotes are in the rules. In that situation the T is still KOS, but the CT is just gunplanting which is against the rules.

If they're in a stack getting continuously gunplanted, no, do not freekill them.

@Krumzie YAOO MINGGG

The RTV limit would have to be raised, as the new maps will still be rtv'd immediately. It's very rare for us to actually be able to play a fun map.

For a pretty good headset look at the Logitech G432 . It's fifty dollars, but surround sound and will last you at least 2+ years (for me at least). Mic quality is pretty good on this one aswell.

I believe this is a thing being looked into constantly. To add something @Trazz said in this thread :

Here's a scenario! There are thirty people online, 10 CT's, and 20T's. Five Ct's have mics, five do not. If the mic'd Ct's die, we shouldn't just end the round. If anything, implementing an order command that displays the order like !fo would be our best bet (Abuse reported and harsh punishments). Also btw: Ct ranks

To re-state and sum up: Microphones are affordable and people have access to them, it just comes down the peoples preferences and insecurities. I don't think we should be restricting people based on that. I only know of one person who utilizes chat orders for "ez kills", and no one likes them anyway.

Why not just demote Tyymunk to "KEEP SG GREAT!"? I'm so excited to finally be a part of this. Does the winner solely get bragging rights, or a bright and shiny award?

It's similar to what @Metal said in the old thread. It was a long and hard progress, and it looked like it was not worth it.

If any change are to be made, make it so freedays can't be given through chat. That's where a lot of the confusion/chaos comes. I do not think we should be limiting strong CT players just because they don't use a microphone. That would be like banning all streamers who don't use a face cam.

Regardless if it is on the servers as a rule or not, some things are just not allowed anywhere. Players should use their common sense, and if someone who's being racist is using," It'S nOt In ThE rUlEs" they're just stupid. Ignore these people, start recording, and file a player complaint.

Which server is this about? To my knowledge, most of them have it in !calladmin .

We can't have both? We should make admin of the month recognize not only the people working on our servers and helping out behind the scenes, but also the admins who sufficiently go above and beyond to make each individual's experience special. It is not to say admin of the month doesn't already do that, but this would just put some more flavor into the pot. I disagree. I can tell you while you may not see IA's online, they play enough to be able to do their jobs (and good at that). If someone just got regular and made a half-assed nomination we would see it:

Something I forgot to add (Which ill edit it): The reason I feel like Regulars should have a chance is that we have our own and different interactions with an admin. Sometimes an admin will just do something extraordinarily special, but it wouldn't get noticed due to it just being an interaction between the two. I'm aware we could probably already PM an IA, and that most IA's know what's going on with the "Good" admins. However, I think a section where we can more easily express our specific distinct interactions would throw some (extra) added meaning. Well, these nominations would be taken seriously with proper reasoning behind it. I feel it would be easy to fish out a friend writing some BS for their admin friend.

Thinking about the admin of the month, which is going to be coming around shortly, I wanted to have a way to throw some +1's towards that admin I feel deserves it. I thought of a system that would send votes to the IA+'s that decide on the admin of the month. Players could submit the name of the admin, and reasons why they should receive it. The only person to receive the "votes" would be the group of IA+'s who decide who get the rank/reward. This would be a private sub-section, where only certain individuals have access to view other nominations. Normal forum rules would apply, the and style of writing would be similar to an admin complaint (Longer than 4-5 sentences and hopefully mature). Abuse/Shitposting would be taken action on as any other post. The only people who could send in a nomination are Regulars and Honorable Gamers. I say this because if you're genuinely invested in the community, 50 posts isn't hard. Anyone above LG/A technically has a chance of receiving it, so they shouldn't be able to nominate someone. I would place this in the Community Section and either above or below the Admin Applications sub-forum. Edit: Just to add ( @Dominic ), the IA+'s would simply view these and take them with a grain of salt. All this should do is give them some more options or things to think about.

1. For pistols, if I notice someone autoswitch I won't kill them. However, if I ask them to drop it and they take an exorbitant amount of time I will kill them/ knife warning. 2. To my knowledge it is NOT KOS. 3. That would be a KOS order as that gets them killed because they land on each other's heads. An order that sends all the t's off in the diving board can lead to deaths regardless, so CT's should stay away. 4. If i'm being attacked by another T i'll pull out my rifle to kill them, then re-lr that T (if not dead). It's really situational, but if you're just doing it to get another chance you shouldn't and is punishable.

If a CT completes the fo, then dies while fo is still active the order should still be enforced. I've seen people think that once this happens it's time to move on but if I'm not wrong, you follow the order. As for CT's dying mid-way through the order, if an admin is on they usually get on mic. For times without an admin, I've seen players type an order in chat and have that be the order. This is a scenario which only benefits half of the players (who actually look at chat), but it's better than nothing.

Thanks for the clarity, but yeah @Kicks this idea would be great for events like Admins Vs. Players. My apologies, I was referencing a thread where a CA (I believe) said this. I can't find that thread, and I also don't remember if an official answer was given or not.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20108[/ATTACH]

Admins are already allowed, and incentivized, to move players from T to CT. Who they switch, however, is up to their discretion. If I'm not wrong there's already a CT lock when ratio gets bad. I think I'm misunderstanding what you're saying.

Never heard of that song, but wouldn't out Hopsin at goat you're tripping.

NO! WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT THE SUPERMARKET ALBUM THAT DOES NOT COUNT. Also, @John , taking a few lines (the ones not from supermarket) out of context/ seriously isn't one of the ways you should be shitting on Logic. Trust me, there are lots of more things you could attack him from/about. Imagine fucking not putting Eminem in GOAT, but putting Amine in very talented and Future + T-Pain in GOAT. Better yet Logic in trash

It would change something, a higher incentive to play T side other than fun. If it's a contest a prize would be involved.