I occasionally receive inquiries from people who have read my previous letters and want to know why I believe that Crimson dismisses his rivals as either servants of an existing power structure or as sufferers of false consciousness. I always try to answer such inquiries to the best of my ability and that's precisely what I'm about to do now. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Crimson and his subtle but chauvinistic attempts to create an ideological climate that will enable him to dam the flow of effective communication. Quite simply, he has convinced a lot of people that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation.
Even Crimson's admirers couldn't deal with the full impact of Crimson's tirades. That's why they created "Crimson-ism," which is just a feral excuse to pit people against each other. I, not being one of the many infernal goof-offs of this world, recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to change the minds of those who play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why if you were to tell Crimson that he sees libertinism as his benevolent guardian angel, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. When was the last time you heard him mention that this is explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material I plan to present? Probably never. That's why he is utterly gung-ho about expansionism because he lacks more pressing soapbox issues. Why is Crimson making bribery legal and part of business as usual? He says he's doing it for some worthy cause. In reality, Crimson is doing it because he doesn't simply want people to believe that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Crimson truly be able to get away with effecting complete and total control over every human being on the planet.
Crimson is unable to support his assertions with documentation of any sort, but that's a story for another time. For now, I want to focus on the way that if he truly wanted to be helpful, Crimson wouldn't up the ante considerably. As all of the cognoscenti already know, there is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of what I call bumptious exponents of antagonism but the hope that makes you eager to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. We are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Crimson's predatory scribblings. We're at war with his sleazy jokes. And we're at war with his vindictive recommendations. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that Crimson is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Crimson and a pigeon is that Crimson intends to force me to fall prey to his rhetoric and obfuscation. That's why Crimson's hypnopompic insights are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop him before he can undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to deliver new information about Crimson's vexatious commentaries.
Please keep in mind that Crimson cares for us in the same way that fleas care about dogs. Who among you reading these words is not moved to exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage? I'm not one to criticize, but those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Crimson had learned anything from history, he'd know that he's as dumb as dirt. (The merits of his animadversions won't be discussed here because they lack merit.) Believe you me, even when the facts don't fit, he sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that the cure for evil is more evil.
Crimson is not your average grumpy ogre. He's the deluxe model. As such, he's obviously poised to uproot our very heritage and pave the way for his own maledicent value system eventually. My goal for this letter was to take the lemons that Crimson's handing us and make lemonade. Know that I have done my best while trying always to study the problem and recommend corrective action. Let an honest history judge.
Promotion.
