Italian Jew

So no Braveheart-like epic battle for SG?

Wait...who's Beth?

5w3ZENhUlDU

Let's see....last night there weren't any boring orders during the rounds I played. The night before that, there was one or two rounds where the T's got owned (T's own fault). The night before that the CT's struggled for any other orders besides stay past first cell for a few rounds before people switched teams. All in all, I say there was MAYBE 2 or 3 rounds of boring play. Maybe you just get on with shitty people or you yourself cannot think of anything creative. It's not our problem if people can't think. I wasn't labeling him biased as much as I was pointing out the reasons why the argument is invalid and could cause more problems for a system that is perfectly fine the way it is. Instead of saying, "you're wrong because you think this way", I stated, "your idea is wrong because it is flawed by this way of thinking and here are some examples". There is a big difference there cupcake. I never stated I didn't have any bias, that portion of your argument is made moot. Everybody has some bias, so get over it. No, it doesn't, but forming my argument in a "smart" way is a lot better than just complaining about something. Whether I am right or wrong is irrelevant because all I am doing is trying to prove a point which I think is right. Other people will always think it is wrong, so my idea or his idea aren't universally right or wrong. I am thinking of the "other half" and they have it pretty good already. Their arguments they are trying to get across are that it is both fun and makes the round go faster. If it is always fun, why then do some T's not want to do it if they are asked to participate in a death game (current rules)? If it was so much fun, everyone would be jumping at the occasion. The only team that does always jump at the occasion is the CT team. This shows the interest or "fun" is more one sided. Their second point is that it would speed up the round because they can get soooooooooo boring. They fail to recognize the reason why a round would become boring and that is themselves. You cannot blame T's for not wanting to rush a wall of camping CT's with AWPs. Sometimes the T's somehow get and advantage and disrupt the CT's enough to win the round, other times the CT's blow away rebelling T's, and other times, it is a long drawn out round. Why would you expect the T's to do something to fix a problem the CT's caused? If they are bored, they can create orders to move the T's around, give them something to do, or even ask if any want to do a death game. Am I not thinking about the "other half" enough? Maybe if I ignore common sense, then I could be at that level. I dunno, what do you think? If you can't argue your own point, don't even try to talk about someone else's unless you know what you're doing. Anything else on your mind?

So we should just stay quiet when people propose ideas that some people do not like? If he has a right to propose an idea, I have a right to say why I don't think it is a necessary one. LOL, I never see YOU on! It must mean that you NEVER get on the PB server. Or.... We obviously get on at different parts of the day. Or.... I was on with a different name (or you were on with a different name). Should we assume you are on PB 24/7 and are the all seeing eye of SG? You're an admin. You can interrupt them as you please.

Removing a tactic that T's can use to disorganize CT's should require more than one or two SA's/AO's opinions on the matter. Making it an official rule is one thing, but enforcing it because you have friends in high places is another. If enough people vote for it (more than just a simple majority) and the higher ups get together to discuss/implement the rule, then I wouldn't have much to discuss unless it causes too many problems in game. I get on when I get on and not always with my tags on or with my normal name. If it would please you, I can PM you or sign in on a time sheet. Then am I allowed to respond? I argue because it is the incorrect way to deal with things here, whether you admit it or not.

Why did you have to go and say that? I was going to go undermine Cromyth's efforts : P

That is kind of defying admin protocol by enforcing imaginary rules you created yourself (seeing as how you aren't red or yellow, you aren't immune from this). I haven't seen enough instances in a timely enough fashion to condone muting the T's. The CT's should be able to deal with it themselves. If they can't, they obviously aren't doing their job well.

I've seen respectable amounts of T wins and CT wins that included T's talking at the beginning. The CT's that get their act together and actually control the T's can usually win the round. Ordering them to be silent for the orders works wonders and typing gives irrefutable evidence that an order was placed. Don't let the T's dictate what the CT's need to do. Nothing will stop them from camping. Also, if you are asking for a timed script, what happens if the CT's don't give orders in the time the T's were muted? The T's would still be able to talk/annoy the CT's and many times, orders take a while to be given (unless they are typed orders bound to a key). The problem still exists and having the T's muted for a lengthy period of time is unrealistic.

You can play death games now, just with permission. If you want to "test" your manliness, then you have the right to do so.

No, we just enjoy the way our server has been running. We have formed our own opinions on the matter and aren't "blinded" by any means. Nice of you to assume though in your super cool blue text. You seem to be following the path of blaming the T's for the inability of CT's to create non-boring orders. What is wrong with having the current system of allowing death games with T permission? The CT's don't get a chance to kill off every T they can with little effort? Mad that you actually have to think besides spurting out a random death game to play? How can T's rebel the same as now in death games? The T's will already be in some place (pool, big cage, soccer, etc.) and CT's will be camping with AWPs and M4s. If the T doesn't participate, they are killed. If a T incorrectly participates, they are killed. It's just a matter of time before the T's try to rebel (and get gunned down by the CT's) or all of the T's except one die in the death game. You can guarantee it will be boring after the first few rounds of this and it isn't as easy as conventional orders given by CT's for the T's. The game is already fair the way it is. Giving the CT's authority to call death games assures that T's will only be playing in these death games each and every round because some newfags and neanderthals will want to run the show. Players on both teams already enjoy the server, so why mess it up to the point where only the CT's get the enjoyment out of it? A few boring rounds may occur, but that is up to the both the T's and CT's, not the current rules. People need to get over it and stop offering a short term solution to their issues of raging and impatience. It will quickly become a broken system that will need to be fixed in the days or weeks after its implementation and it sure as shit takes a long time for anybody to fix something here unless they are personally affected by it. Also, consider this. Whenever CT's ask if any T's want to do a deathgame, do all of the T's jump in line to play? From my experience, at most, give or take half of the T's that want to play in the death game. That means a good size of the T's do not want to play. If you force them to play the game, they are not going to enjoy themselves in the server and possibly not play as much (or seek another server). It seems the only team it benefits completely is...wait for it...building up tension....*drum roll please*... THE CT TEAM! The permission to shoot a T who does something wrong is just too good to pass up. Seems to be simple minded players on our servers, who would have thought?

T's talking in the beginning of the round can confuse and delay CT's for a bit (helpful if one T is already out of cells). If a CT is preoccupied with trying to get orders across, that T can start killing off some CT's. You can type out orders if you need to or still announce them. It rarely occurs where the T team constantly talks and ignores the CT orders. What usually happens is that the T's stop for a bit to clarify what the orders were. If one individual gets killed, who cares? They can ask what the orders were. I haven't seen multiple T's die because they didn't know the orders due to their team talking or spamming in the beginning.

Technically, you can since he never announced or was told to drop the pistol. If he was AFK in the cell, then I'd give him some leniency, but if a T went AFK after going somewhere else, I wouldn't blame the CT.

Because some people rage too easily. I'll go through long, boring rounds where CT's just horde us somewhere and camp with AWPs, but I won't argue that there needs to be a rule stating CT's cannot camp anymore. I feel as if a lot of people are mislead that "boring" rounds are frequent while the opposite is true.

One shoots bullets, the other shoots out cupcakes and flower petals.

That's one hell of an assumption.

The thread was about an I Am Legend scenario. There were no zombies in the movie and you bunch of nincompoops took the thread into the wrong direction. Excuse him for the one being on topic.

Unless you have reliable admins on 24/7, the CT's are going to quabble over who decides the deathgame, what the exact rules are, who dies, etc. Let's see why things may get boring for CT's. Round after round, the general rules are for T's to stay in their cells until they are allowed to leave (cell doors open within a minute, the order to stay inside cells is given before or after cells opening, T's wait up to several minutes before CT's find a good camping spot). Many times, T's are forced to sit ad stare at a wall for the entire length of the round. The CT's might call a freeday, but it only occurs with only a minute or less remaining and turns into a turkey shoot. Hell, the freedays are limited to specific rooms or areas of a map. Some people are mislead in thinking that the T's deserve to be killed off easier to the enjoyment of the CT's. They can pretend the T's enjoy deathgames, but the simple fact of the matter is that not all of them do. The CT's, given the chance, are going to go round after round proclaiming a death game because some impatient twat wants to shoot T's as soon as possible. Again, it would be CT's arguing with CT's over whether a death game is played or conventional orders are given. If you want to spice things up, why don't you try giving better orders instead of jerking off in a corner with an AWP praying that one pulls out a gun and starts shooting. You might also want to try joining the T's and trying your luck at rebelling if you're so goddamned bored. Just keep it the way it is now. If the T's want to participate in deathgames, then it is fine. They should be mandatory if a CT orders it so. If enough people want to try it out and it stays, then at the very least, death games should not be done round after round (create MOTD rule). You don't want to turn the Prison Break server into the Infinite Death Game server. That's what we got Minigames and Death Run for.

They aren't zombies...

Depends on the adapter, but from what I have seen, some people can get it to work on all versions of Vista, but with some messing around with settings (I have no idea what they actually did or experienced in the process). Again, it is like with the controllers where you would prbably need to mess around to get them to work. As for the rom sites, just google them. You should find plenty that won't scam you into visiting advertisement sites for access.

http://www.fashion-contactlenses.com/riddick-silver-contact-lenses-1567-0.html I've seen contacts like those and other varieties of weird ones. You just have to know where to look. Don't think I have see full on mirror-like ones, but I'm sure some costume or make-up designed somewhere has.

Old Nintendo controllers with USB capability (i.e. no more BS controls for roms and certain games). A bit of a retro feel for a PC. Get it now? I have read comments that say they don't work on 64-bit Vista, but I don't know why they wouldn't work. There are different brands though and some people have said they work on 64 bit Vista and some say they don't, so I'd say it is safe to assume it is not 100% compatible under all circumstances.

old ...but nice

You've got nothing on those 400,000+ point lamers.