Italian Jew

-lFkXFqHc9E This guy is going to remake all of the campaigns from the first game and allow 2 player mode. He also has redone all of the special infected, but you only see the Boomer in the video. Release in 2010 for PC as freeware I believe.

I have a feeling that the Broncos would have pulled through if McDaniels let Orton play the second half. He looked fine to me on the sidelines, but I guess the coach just didn't want to risk the rest of the season.

The better receivers spend hours on dragging their toes for occasions such as that. Coaches have done a better job emphasizing that since they removed the force out rule.

I get what your saying, but I'd rather bet on the Pats offense getting the job done rather than their defense. Peyton is dangerous from any point on the field and he had more than enough time to create a game winning drive from 40-50 yards out. The Patriots defense isn't something you rely on in a 2 minute drill. They don't have enough depth. Personally, I would have relied on a running play rather than a pass in that situation. Too much can happen if you pass and bad things can happen from what look like good enough plays. The Patriots don't have the greatest running game, but for a big fourth down play, you wouldn't be too crazy set up in a passing play and check into the correct gap away from the blitz. Belichick gambled and lost, but to seal a game like that, you need a good gamble. It looked like it paid off, but poor catching likely cost them the game. That Holmes catch in the Super Bowl wasn't that much of a prayer play anyway. It was a good catch made more amazing than it actually was given the circumstances. Any high to top-rated receiver could have made that catch with ease. If he missed the catch, Pittsburgh would have run another play and had another chance to score, so its not like that play was a win or lose situation anyway.

He had a good call. It only looks bad because that guy bobbled the pass and wound up BEHIND the first down marker. The he had caught the pass correctly at the point of contact, everyone would be talking about how gutsy Belichick was.

Ass backwards week for the NFC East as well as some poor game regulation and NFL review policies. On to next week as Monday's game is going to be a boring matchup. EPIC Sunday Night Football game just about made up for it.

How the flying fuck did Denver let them shift into a fake FG/Punt formation, call a timeout, let them shift into it again, and allow them to score a TD from a punter's pass to a fullback? It was like a 40 yard pass too. LAWL

It ain't a sandwich unless something stuck in it is holding the damned thing together.

Cry Baby Cutler with 5 picks FTL!

In order to do that, you need to do relatively well in school. Get your priorities in line. SG, the internet, video games, etc. should not be the most important things. Gotta spend more time learning than wasting away playing games or surfing the internet.

Unless you provide a source, I doubt it because they let the developers choose the servers and not Sony. I heard they might be charging for monthly download packages for PSN, but not anything for online play.

I think in December of the same year Halo 3 came out. It wasn't a set period of outage, but because so many people got new accounts and tried to get on around the holidays, some users were experiencing outages. I was cut out one evening, but I was free to play online ever since. There might a few more smaller instances of outages, but I haven't experienced or been aware of them.

That was one of those two times that I saw the servers were down. I was smart enough not to try multiplayer until a few weeks after I got the game though. I knew millions of people would be on crashing the servers for the first day and waited until all the ranks were more spread out.

He was talking about server breakdowns, not maintenance. There have only been less than a handful of times when the servers were not up and it wasn't due to planned maintenance.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=Q0EDGLF7

I've seen two instances where the Xbox Live servers were not running in the entire time of owned an account, and they were relatively early on. They were also only down for a few hours, so it wasn't a huge deal. The Modern Warfare thing was fixed and I haven't heard anything new about it, so I assume it is still working.

PS3 is going to have Netflix in the future and the Xbox Live servers rarely go down (has happened before). The PS3 just seems more British though.

This is probably the best piece of advice.

All the cool people stopped playing. That's what happened.

Yes, Cry baby Cutler is off moping on the sidelines in Chicago.

All that matters really is who you get to play in the first few rounds of the playoffs. Denver will probably have a home game during the wild card round, but if they get beyond that, I'm not liking their odds.

If a few select teams don't improve themselves enough and Denver doesn't have a colossal meltdown, then it is a distinct possibility for a 10-6 to a 12-4 season.

I said they had an easy schedule towards the end with only two definitely good teams left to play. San Diego has no running game, New York is in a downward spiral due to their lack of a secondary, Washington suffers from offensive anemia and their defense gives up on big games, Kansas City is played twice and they are in the gutter, Oakland is also a joke. That leaves Philly and Indy as the only definitely good teams you play. That is 2 out of 8 remaining games. I have already explained the circumstances of the previous games, so stop looking at only the numbers. This is like the fifth time I have told you. Your schedule isn't that bad when you compare all the factors in play and when they were in play. If you look back on it, Denver has lucked out on the weeks when they played certain teams.

Not really. They got to a 3-0 start I think, but they began losing a bit, then winning, then losing again. It was back and forth all season. This season, they lost their first game towards the middle to good teams (as opposed to last year where Denver lost to the likes of Kansas City and Oakland). San Diego had an easier schedule down the stretch last season, so while they were doing the same thing as Denver (losing, winning, losing, etc.), they stayed close enough for their 4 game rally at the end. This year though, they end the season with mostly easy games (except Cincy and Dallas). Denver is up a game and a half and has a similarly easy schedule (depending on if teams can turn around or not).This year though, the second San Diego game will not decide your playoff hopes.

Depends on what kind of mood I'm in.