BoM

Frequency music on speaker. If you sleep with headphones in you're a psychopath.

demoted.

Yeah I mean responding to your own thread definitely shows if you're able to handle constructive criticism properly and such, but that being said there are definitely people who have responded to or clarified singular points made on their admin apps and still gotten admin.

scrolls says no. Some sort of combined function team. not sure yet. Other plans for them.

Hey Stop it.

I was gonna write something, but I couldn't think of anything to write. Video says it all. 20 scrolls is now Lead Server Manager. (Shoutout @Error.)

Please check your direct messages on here.

To put some clarity on this - 98% of people won't find themselves being seen as disruptive by the board. As stated previously this was put in place to be used as a tool by the BDs to remove the most unwanted people in the community. Cracking a joke, doing a little trolling, or breaking the occasional rule will not put you on our radar or have you being seen as disruptive to the community. If you feel someone is truly being disruptive then message a BD about it and we will document it and take your comments into consideration when looking into that individual or a situation. The prime example of this is of course Polarzz, someone who we had received many messages about from a variety of people basically stating that they felt he didn't belong and was doing nothing but being anti-community, insulting people, making homophobic comments etc. It was a decision that came from looking at a long span of his behavior along with those messages sent to us regarding how he was affecting them. I've edited the wording slightly to try and clarify this.

Alright, then I'll make it clear for you. I'm disengaging from my conversation with you. You have gone from loosely forming a relative argument to semantics and trying to force fact checks. Stop quoting me on this thread please.

I...don't care? I'm stating my opinion based on knowledge I've gained, statistical evidence, and other factors. I've made responses mostly based on questions prompted to me. I am not here to debate with sited sources nor convince you or anyone else to change their mind or prove I am right and they are wrong. P.S. your graph, which I did find last night but found to be looking at too small a scope of data, shows that complications actually occur in about 2 in 10 pregnancies, not 1 as I had stated. So not sure what you're trying to dismiss with that data. 196 in 1000 people is pretty significant...that's not just the exception.

Requiring her to carry it to term, generally some 5-6 more months (93% of abortions performed in the first 13 weeks)...which can be both physically and emotionally detrimental to the woman. Not to mention potential pregnancy complications, which based on tentatively factual data I'm looking at is about a 1 in 10 chance if not more. Just not about demanding that a woman put her own body through that. Thinking you misunderstood quality of life...I'm talking about the quality of life for the woman being forced by law to carry a baby to term. Her quality of life for those 9 months and thereafter. I won't even get into the negative mental effects that it would have on those women for being forced to do that, which also puts a greater threat of complications for the mother and baby.

What? Literally just talking about abortion, i.e. the thing roe v wade affects. Post your opinion man. have at it.

It's simply not black and white for me in it being murder when the not fully formed baby is not capable of sustaining life on its own at the time of its demise. I do not believe that a humans life begins at conception or for a while thereafter. You are welcome to believe otherwise.

quality of life correct.

Beloved community members, In response to a growing sense of need to remove certain community members who provide nothing positive and are here only to troll and wreak havoc we have decided to establish a new rule. This is in response to comments that have been made to us regarding how certain situations are handled as well as conversations that were had at the community meeting. In times past BDs were far less lenient to those who simply wasted a lot of time and harassed staff and members alike in ways that skirted around the rules. This, ironically, led to less conflict and less hostility among those not removed from the community because they could co-exist here peacefully without the annoyance or excessive negativity. New Rule: Do not be continuously disruptive to the community via consistent trolling, breaking rules, or speaking badly about other members/staff/the community. This is not something that will be enforced by Admin -> IA, but something that is issued directly by the BDs. If the BDs collectively and unanimously decide that you are not fit for this community and are simply a nuisance disturbing our staff and members then we reserve the right to remove you for as long as we feel is necessary. This is already something we had the general ability to do as leaders of the community, however this is now a more written in stone statement so those attempting to skirt around the rules understand the full scope of authority and ruling that the BDs are applying. Thank you for you time.

Polarzz has been banned for 6 months for being disruptive to the community while arguing with mods on the forums. This on top of using homophobic slurs on the servers after already being demoted some time ago for in fact: being homophobic. Now it's up to the individual to prove they are or are not a certain way, however in polarzz case we have evidence of him being clearly homophobic here and elsewhere on top of saying homophobic slurs on our platform(s). All that aside, this ban was issued based on a new rule regarding being disruptive to the community. Polarzz stated very clearly that he doesn't care about the community or anyone here and was only here to disrupt a community he says he is no longer apart of. Cya champ. Good luck with the homophobia.

Yeah I'm good with this line of thinking for the most part. Still gonna worry for those that are raped etc, will see how that plays out. Not sure what the hell Aster is getting at so I'm ignoring that :).

damn you really got me there! Yeah so I will still continue to care about the whole life of a woman vs what is a barely established human life. Not even sorry about it.

Nah you right this one is pretty weak. I apologize...I will reprimand him accordingly.

Continue living in a state that still respects womens' rights.

Funnier than the original! FR FR YO CEPT NO ONE CARES! Please leave the political posts to @Gentoo& @jazzy...with the occasional @lynxiepost.

this mf is going off the rails dawg, this isnt even about the movie any more. infact, this thread was never about the movie, it was about outing those in this community that would still much rather see gay people in the gutter and being put down under the guise of "religion" or "moral decay" instead of admitting that they need some boogeyman in their life to justify the negative experiences in their life rather than taking responsibility to their misfortune Anyone trying to argue some garbage moral justification to taking issue to a 5 second animated scene showing two girls kissing should stop wasting their breath and promptly yeet themselves out of the community.

@Gentoo?