fantastic

Going to reject this seeing as OP deleted the original suggestion... if you want to re-open this @BadBunny feel free to DM me. No suggestion or idea is "bad", but next time please leave the suggestion up in OP so we have a chance to discuss this. If you suggested this chances are someone else in the future will suggest it too and it would have been nice to have this discussion on hand.

This rule discussion got buried under a bunch of others and I just found this ancient fossil. I'll find time to wrap this up with the other boys - for now consider this a bump.

@TheZZL did you have any other areas on this map that you felt needed clarifying, or did Manny's post answer your concerns/questions?

NGL, it seems a little ridiculous to have a rule dedicated to a specific edge case like this when you can avoid such a situation by doing what Infinityward mentioned below: It looks like this thread wrapped up naturally so I'm going to lock this thread. I can see your intent behind why you'd want to make such a discussion though, so thank you for bringing this up @oDriips- .

This would likely be something added with the warden plugin if we decide to go down that route. Please feel free to move the discussion over to this thread. Thanks .

Please continue the discussion here as we will likely be bundling the offmic functionality with warden if we decide to include it. We're just looking for opinions at this point so no promises as to whether or not this will get implemented. Thanks .

@maddius In order to properly moderate the thread and to provide some background I had to make a new thread, but I included a link to this thread as well for some background. Feel free (and others) to post your opinions from this thread into the megathread as well. Note that we have two separate threads for !offmic and attainment of warden.

DISCLAIMER: Anything discussed in this thread is subject to change. Nothing here is set in stone and we're merely looking for opinions as to what features the community wants. We strongly encourage you to spread this thread around and get the opinions of as many players as possible. This thread will serve as the megathread for anything that doesn't relate to wardens controlling chat and how people become wardens. Feel free to discuss anything implementation-wise or whether or not you want the warden plugin to exist. MISSION: Differentiate ourselves by making the warden system unique. We should retain our current DM-like playstyle where it isn't difficult to rebel. Ensure warden system is not being abused by the same people round after round. PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY WARDEN PLUGIN: Solve issue of chat orders going unnoticed and causing chaos on the servers Solve issue of conflicting orders being given by multiple CTs Solve issue of CTs talking over each other and Ts flooding voice chat Please read through the entirety of the thread to catch up on the discussion before posting. Thanks . You can find some previous discussion here.

DISCLAIMER: Anything discussed in this thread is subject to change. Nothing here is set in stone and we're merely looking for opinions as to what features the community wants. We strongly encourage you to spread this thread around and get the opinions of as many players as possible. This thread is related to the warden plugin that the Jailbreak team is considering implementing. We would like some input as to what the community feels is the best way of managing chat (mainly voice) as a warden. That is, if you're a player on Jailbreak and are warden, how do you want to be able to control the terrorists? Some suggestions to get the discussion started: 1. Wardens shouldn't be able to mute anyone at all 2. Wardens should be able to mute Ts for a certain number of seconds so they can give an order 3. Wardens should be able to mute Ts and fellow CTs for a certain number of seconds so they can give an order without conflicting orders Please read through the entirety of the thread to catch up on the discussion before posting. Thanks . Some previous discussion around offmic can be found here. You can find the warden megathread here.

DISCLAIMER: Anything discussed in this thread is subject to change. Nothing here is set in stone and we're merely looking for opinions as to what features the community wants. We strongly encourage you to spread this thread around and get the opinions of as many players as possible. This thread is related to the warden plugin that the Jailbreak team is considering implementing. We would like some input as to what the community feels is the best way of attaining warden. That is, if you're a player on Jailbreak, how do you want to be able to become warden? Some suggestions to get the discussion started: 1. Warden queue 2. Players voting for who the warden will be 3. Wardens must be in the top X CTs Please read through the entirety of the thread to catch up on the discussion before posting. Thanks . You can find the warden megathread here.

Your feedback about offmic is noted. Could you please make another thread as a rule discussion pointing out specific rules you feel is detrimental to the overall experience of JB? I think your concern is valid and we can take a look at whether anything needs tweaking/removal. Thanks .

Bumping this, although from the JB community meeting it was implicitly decided that the offmic command would only be able to be used by wardens. When continuing discussion on this topic please keep this in mind . We can also consider whether to have the offmic plugin mute fellow CTs and Ts, or just the Ts. EDIT: The offmic command itself is still a topic of debate. We haven't decided whether or not we will implement something like this. If one was implemented, it would likely go hand in hand with the warden change.

As mentioned previously in this thread and the JB community meeting we're discussing adding variable round times that depend on the map. For example, larger maps like Clouds and Moonjail which offer more to do may have an extended round time whereas smaller maps where rebelling is a lot easier such as Razor will have the same round time. Feel free to leave your thoughts on this suggested change.

Our rule against baiting: "CTs are not allowed to purposely make attempts at getting themselves knifed by Ts, subject to admin discretion. In any case though, a T is KOS for having damaged a CT." Since this is a rule discussion feel free to discuss, but that's our current stance on baiting at the moment.

Moved to SG Suggestions Box @Infinityward.

Rejecting this... we've made it clear that chat orders can be overriden at any time without counting as a conflicting order so this should no longer be an issue.

JB isn't interested due to the fact that rules change, the gamemode is pretty straightforward, and we didn't really think there would be much interest in watching an introduction video. Thanks for the suggestion though.

Rejected - if you're in a deathgame you should be aware that it will start at any second. Thanks for the suggestion though.

This is something that we're not looking into since it's not difficult to just switch to a team, type what you want to say, then go back to spectator. This idea seems like it has limited use cases and wouldn't really be necessary. Thanks for the suggestion though!

Pretty tired of seeing you getting the runaround - DM me what you want off the Steam store ( EDIT: He declined.

LOL @Fuze @Montag Yeah good suggestion, we probably need it although it's not unfair to say that as an awper you should be able to prevent rushes by holding angles.

I will add this to the list of things we (JB ATs) need to discuss. This suggestion ties in fairly closely with ZZL's thread a while back. Thanks for the suggestion

@Lizard , I'm going to move this to rule discussion since this is indeed a rule discussion. We've had multiple discussions about this in the past so I strongly encourage you to read over those (you can search for threads via Google or in the search box above). You will definitely want to read this as well: https://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=61024.

Congratulations everyone @Prez nice to see you back, wave1:Internal Affairs looks good on you

We already have a thread with this suggestion included: https://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=91610 Locking this to keep discussion in one place. Thanks