black eagle you have stated many times now that you feel sorry for me, and even went so far as to call me ignorant, that's personal. not read the rest of your statement but yea, that about sums it up, no one else took the time to call me ignorant or that they feel bad for me. And as for being patient, Im an infinite well of patience, I think the fact that im still here trying to get my original thought across should be proof of that. Im glad you have said your last on this, because to be honest you have been the least helpful person to post so far. Next time I ask for ways to occupy my time in spectate, please feel free to weigh in. But in this post you have basically done nothing to address the actual problem Ive stated. You have simply said that its not going to change, and you feel sorry for my ignorant self.
This is the only valid reason thats been stated, I ignored all the others because they are just not valid(and more or less revolve around the same issue " we dont force death games"). If a ct does not want to give whatever lr, he should just shoot the t, Ive stated this already, it goes with the whole, not dragging out the round thing. There should not be some long 1-2 min production to entertain the last t, who more then likely did nothing during the round. And as stated, I could care less if some ct gains a few points or some t losses a few. Cts are already not allowed to camp round after round, and I pretty sure no one is going to rise to the top ranks by camping all round in hopes of getting one free kill at the end.
If the idea is to stop one person from holding up the round, I dont see any reason why we cant force an lr, other then your stated, "o thats forcing a death game" once again stating the obvious like im too dumb to understand semantics. Point being death game or no, dont hold up the round for one person. Just as the cts gain a free point by killing the last t, the last t gains a point by not loosing one, if he refuses an lr to ensure that he is not killed that round. Are people doing this? I dont know, but its as much a valid point as rank whore cts getting freekills.
yea, that right there is the definition of a personal attack, saying that I lack some basic human characteristic is about as personal as it gets.
When the server was young, I and many other players would force the last t to take an lr, if he refused, we killed him. I did this in full view of admins, many who practiced this themselves. I never got punished or had to deal with any crap for it. Eventually I drifted away from playing pb to work on maps for various sg servers, When I came back almost everything had changed, alot of it for the better, but I still feel this is an issue that just got swept under the rug in favor of dealing with other more pressing issues on the server. Now that the rule list is basically sorted, it just seemed like a good idea to bring this back up. Most of the stated reasons for why this wont work revolve around the fear of contradicting the motd. Just like the rules change for the last ct, there should also be some consideration for the last t, especially if he just feels like dragging out the round.