jeN

Not reasonable and tbh I'd say if it was conflicting orders and CT's were killing anyone they seen I would consider it freekilling. The prisoners shouldn't be put at fault bc CT's can't get their rules for that round straight.

very good sir!

Double posting, GET @ ME Adding 2 new extensions to rules: 1. Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head. This does not mean, however, that warning shots are required when a terrorist is obviously disobeying orders. 2. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation.

Good idea, I'll add that to the PB rule thread and for those who play/lurk this try to remind people of the change as !rules and !motd are broken and I cannot fix them despite trying my little heart out. =[

Hate the idea of a warden tbh. What if we add something like this to the rules: Maybe better worded if someone can think of a better way though Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head. The user with a mic giving out orders is the priority order OVER text commands. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation.

Ehhh I can add a exception to the warning shot rule like "Do not just shoot prisoners in the head for uncrouching/jumping/etc, unless they're actually rebelling" ?

That isn't really something you can control with rules though =/

Ah one of the broken ones, will remove from list now. =] Thanks!

td;dr

Put it into words better than I would have. Do I think the CT's should be a BIT more leniant regarding killing people simply because they aren't crouching? Yes, but if I put too many exceptions to the rules it would just get confusing. But because this is now mostly about warning shots, besides that issue what else could be improved upon?

What is this spamming of moving images business going on in here? You should learn to convey your emotions appropriately by using text rather than moving pictures. I am disappoint.

Congrats Alucard side eyeing the randoms though unless you become active!

It's a trial to try and fix the failure that PB has become.

Love the people who vote for everything though. People wonder why their opinions are never taken into consideration.

From everything I've read, the warning shots were never supposed to be how admins were enforcing them. They were only ever meant to be for holstered pistols. =/ Unless there was a thread in my absence and someone did not update the actual rules thread.

Whoa whoa, I was adding a poll still lollll

A midway of the 2week poll to ask how you guys feel the rules are working out. What isn't working? What is? What could still be improved on? etcetcetc

It makes me lol

SUP

This is why I'm bad at CS:S, bad aim.