Goku

@Metal those actually sound like some good edits. I'm a bit iffy on adding a pistol to the one way cell as I can see it getting a bit OP as we've seen Ts take out half (if not more) the ct team from a normal cell. The one way cell has a bigger range and would be a bit harder for a CT to kill. Maybe in practice it won't be OP, but in theory it seems like it might. I'd be down to testing your edited version for a bit. Don't think we should add global back tho. It's not that different than razor and razor is better overall imo. Edits that metal is suggesting would at least make this version if electric unique enough. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Forcing a last request = forcing a death game. You are basically telling the T pick something that ends in me killing you, or I kill you for not doing that. As in the example that Anguish gave you, that is the best way IMO to counter a T refusing to LR. And actually, taken from that same thread you linked about the expanded MOTD Forcing LR is forcing them to do something that kills them. With your example, I personally don't think you should have just killed the two farting around and swimming. I still don't think orders of, as an example, "go to big cage. Be there by 3:00" are allowed, as IMO it fits under what Xeno said in the admin section back in September. To me, at least, saying "by 3:00" (since most of the time by 3:00 is followed up by "or KOS"), is just a way to bypass warning shots. For example, the order is be in big cage by 3:00. Well, a T happens to be afk, comes back, and is clearly on his way to big cage by since its now 2:55, he can be killed? IMO, with the example you gave, since the Ts were just farting around and swimming, I would just consider it a delay. It's not like they are in say showers, or they are trying to rebel. I would have just warning shot them and told them to get on the diving board. I will defer to a higher up, as they might see the situation different. Taken from this image the rule states that CTs may camp if it helps their team, and that last must not delay. There is no rule that last CT can not camp. This is a common misconception. People often respond to this with "camping is delaying".Not necessarily. Another good example is the scout tower on lego. If the order is say, soccer. And the last CT is in the scout tower, and Ts are actively rebelling, and the CT is killing the rebels from the tower, he isn't delaying. He is camping, but not delaying. As CT, it is your job to make sure that the Ts aren't rebelling, and as it was just a freeday, you enforce that they aren't doing shit like going on a catwalk, or going in a vent, or walking around with a primary. To counter your "why should I be the one to go out there", why should they be the ones having to rush into armory where you have the upper hand? I wouldn't say you were breaking a rule by camping, but it could be argued it was delaying. That does however make me question the difference between camping armory during a freeday, and camping soccer during a "freeday no soccer." I'd like a higher up's opinion on how this would be ruled in regards to delaying.

Just to throw it out there, if we are going to argue over if the map is heavily CT sided, or heavily T sided, shouldn't that be a good reason in favor of removing? The fact that there are arguments being made showing its not a balanced map, to me at least, shows its not well made and is worth removing. Personally, I voted to remove it. It's nothing but another remake of electric, and as most electric remakes are, it sucks. One way windows are fine, for example the teleport tower on Lego. That one is balanced out by the fact that there's a chance to die while trying to go up. You also don't have as good of a vantage point from that window. As pointed out, the one way window behind big cage is just plain stupid and OP. The map maker just went overboard with one way Windows. Even if @Metal removes the window completely, there's still other issues with the map. Electric maps in general are quite bland in terms of things to do. I don't agree with the common argument of "we've always had multiple electrics". Just because we used to do it, doesn't mean we still have to. As Spartan has pointed out, overall this just isn't a good map. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Close enough :3 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But I sang that one song about calling me big pop-pa. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I mean, I tried to serenade you with that last night but you threatened to ban me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don't play when the server is low on population very much do you? Can't tell you how many times I played when there was less than 10 people and the ratio would still get stacked. Even with 5 people, I've seen it stacked 3-2. The amount of players on the server does not matter, as more often than not, from my experience, the ratio is more likely to be lopsided with less people than with more. Again, I don't think we should add an autobalance, as it would only makes things worse IMO, but your point of admins being on 90% has nothing to do with the issue.

Admins aren't guaranteed to be on 90% of the time like you claim to begin with, but it doesn't matter if there's 5-10 people on, or 24 people on.

You are missing the entire point of no admin's being on. Even if there is one on 90% of the time, that still leaves the other 10% that the players would have to deal with. And to be honest, I would be a bit annoyed if I got called to PB just to fix a ratio. I do still think that an autobalance is bad, but you are missing the point of an admin not being on.

Vote kick is something that's been discussed many times and always ends in the same manner. It can be easily abused and there's nothing to stop someone from just reconnecting. I've suggested in the past making the power to vote kick a subscriber perk, but it was pointed out that's just making it a weaker paid admin, and still leaves the issue of them just coming back. In the end, best thing to do is just get an admin, or demo and file a complaint. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1:3 would not be great. That would mean we'd be having ratios like 4-12, 5-15 or 6-18. 1:2 is a great ratio to aim towards, but isn't necessarily something that has to be in place 100% of the time. For example, 9-15 is to many the perfect ratio. And I think something like 7-12 is fine compared to 6-13. As Rawr pointed out, an automated switch would do a good job of keeping the ratio at 1:2, but would possibly move a CT that is actually doing something rather than one camping. If there is a horrible ratio, you can always try to get an admin on to fix it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Friend drug me to this small town pool bar. So I'm listening to whatever country song these people have playing on the jukebox while waiting to leave Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

@Nuclear Onion yeah I didn't word my post correctly. I have Sunday ticket, but I wish the NFL would get better options. I'd like to not have to pay for it just to watch 3-4 Dallas games because they're out of market. Sunday ticket was a few plays behind past few times I've watched so I'd prefer something better that I can watch live and not pay damn near as much for. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have NFL Sunday ticket for streaming just for the games that Dallas won't be showing since I'm in Houstons market. Not very fond of the stream itself, it's not horrible but could be a lot better. Hoping Yahoos stream Spurs the NFL into something better. Seriously, do you even read threads and think before posting or just the title and post the first thought that comes to mind?

The pros out weigh the cons. I would rather an admin be able to see if someone was being disrespectful or racist in team chat, and in exchange Ts are unable to rush one CT properly. Which lets be honest, how often does: A) Ts try to do a rush like your example. B) more than one T actually rush C) the rush actually work regardless of an admin on CT team. If we remove admin see all, a player can easily go to team chat to disrespect or be racist. We would then have to rely on someone taking a screenshot and sharing, or a higher up checking the chat logs. Compared to the admin being able to directly handle the situation then and there.

GREAT SCOTT!...................HE SCORED!!!!!

... As I pointed out when I initially brought up bringing it to PB, and during the middle of the shit storm that followed claiming it would "save DR", the plugin adds pretty much nothing gameplay wise. It would however add to the community and fun factor. While the PB population isn't exactly low or hard to fill, I do think it would be something fun to keep people coming back.

At what point did Tate establish himself as a runner? Second he lands the ball is coming out due to the defender putting his hand in there. Problem I vented about was the inconsistency with the NFL. The VP basically made shit up as he explained the call and no one seems to understand what exactly a catch is anymore. Also This is a community, and I posted this in the sports section... Honestly I'm not as irritated at the call as I was when I posted this, but still wish the NFL would do something about the horrible wording of the rule that leads to so many bad calls and confusion.

I don't care for the Bears or Lions. There is no salt here, as I literally don't care who won that game. But the NFL really is full of shit with their catch rules at this point. There's no consistency here with what is and isn't a catch in the NFL.

I'm currently using a TV screen as a monitor. Granted I'm not a huge graphicphobe meaning I am so used to a shitty pc. I finally have a nice PC, but I have been able to play CSGO and RL with no problems. I had to edit the actual tv settings to stretch the screen so it fit entirely, but I have no problem reading the text or anything. Just depends how big of a stickler you are for things. I'll probably eventually get an actual computer monitor, but it isn't a high priority for me.

Can anyone here explain how the hell this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ5jbJn08eA was a catch, while plays such as these: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt5d9FoSXIA are not catches? My god. I understand by the stupid rule, that both the Calvin and Dez plays are not catches, as they "did not maintain possession all the way to the ground" or "did not establish themselves as a runner" but my god. How the hell are you going to watch those two plays, and tell me they did not catch that ball? The NFL has got to step in and do something. These rulings and horribly worded rules are getting out of hand. While I do not honestly know of a very clear cut way of defining it, they at least need to be consistent. Here's the NFL VP of Officiating explaining this call: He's so full of shit. At what time did Tate ever have possesion of the ball, and when/how did he have time to become a runner? I understand that these calls are not easy to make, but oh my god. These refs are supposed to be able to take a play, and make consistent calls regardless of who the ref is. The NFL really needs to find some way to make this shit consistent. Maybe just change it where the ref makes a judgement call on if it was a catch or not.... Like seriously, how the hell is the Tate play, and the third play I posted any different???

You should go to the Canadian border, look at how beautiful our country is, then turn around and take your Canadian ass back where you belong. I have no real advice as I haven't really traveled around the country much. NYC was pretty cool tho

Please don't insult my thread by giving it the definition of the derailment posts.

Someone better than you :3 Good to see ya slade. When you get back we need to play some rocket league and Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes. Also, TTT.