Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Vanya

Regular
  • Posts

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Vanya

  1. In my opinion, this "no step" order's entire purpose is to confuse people between taking a step out and not taking a step out. Whenever this order is given the CT always says it extremely fast, making people only hear the second half of the order. The entire statement of "no step out" is completely unnecessary as just saying face the back and freeze is literally the same order with less confusion. If you're going to tell people to take steps, they should be taking steps. I think if someone is intentionally making it unclear whether to take a step out or not based on their wording and how they present the order should count as giving a confusing order. It's like saying freeze, un-crouch and don't crouch. The don't crouch is unnecessary and just adds confusion when it's not heard clearly if the order is spoken fast or without clarity. In my opinion trying to confuse people with unnecessary parts in their orders should count as giving a confusing order, however it's up to the SMs.
  2. It'll probably be a neat addition to the T side but I don't think this will be top priority for the SMs of JB right now. It's just adding on to the current point system that already encourages Ts to rebel but looking at how it would work I think it would be very hard to count legitimate wins. This will just encourage Ts who suck at LRs to cheat LRs even more to get the easy kills and wins, so it may draw away from the whole "LR" aspect.
  3. You can leave this to admin discretion but almost all the regs know not to shoot into stacks (small spaces with 3+ people) as you would be shooting others in the line of fire. In my opinion "crossfire" is unintentionally shooting a T dealing LESS damage to that T than the T you are trying to shoot. If you've played CSGO for more than an hour you would know where to aim when trying to shoot someone, so your bullets shouldn't be going into someone else. For example, if I see an awp shot go into a crowd killing a random person that isn't KOS, that is NOT crossfire. However, if someone is killed in a crowd and 1 or 2 Ts receive some damage (and with that damage they may die) it would generally be OK, but it varies from situation to situation. The best solution to this is to either not give shitty orders telling Ts to stack to intentionally damage the entire crowd over a measly warning shot, or just don't shoot into stacks/crowds. As admins we can slay for freedamage as well, so if we see someone intentionally trying to hit other Ts in the line of fire punishment will be dealt.
  4. @BoM I stole your money pog
  5. I don't play TTT often so I can't say the same about TTT admins. However, I can vouch for the whole "bullying" situation on servers such as JB. You're talking about SG servers as a whole and not just TTT, and there are plenty of cases of players being singled out on JB just because they are disliked by the general population; things like people getting killed for bullshit reasons then ganging up on a kid (even though he didn't break the rules). It's these situations I am worried about on all the servers, and if something should be changed in how an admin behaves it should apply to all servers. You should also think about admins as just regs with powers. We aren't robots that can play 24/7 (although some can) and we aren't always available all the time. These pockets of time without admins on the server are the times you should get your fellow regulars to watch a guy and record clips of rule breaking; it's very uncommon for an entire reg base to not have the capability to record things; it's just the matter if you want to put the effort in yourselves to get rid of rule breakers or just dump the work off onto an admin. If you feel an admin is just feigning ignorance and is just trying to avoid doing anything, make an admin complaint.
  6. I understand where you're going as it does make sense that if people are complaining about a single person they are probably doing something wrong. However, this is not always the case and it could actually result in someone getting falsely punished due to a bullying situation. If a person is breaking the rules or being a nuisance enough for people to get annoyed, a player complaint is always welcome. Using alternative means such as !calladmin and/or notifying admins through admin chat/PMs can also get the admin to focus their attention on that one player. A lot of admins are eager to watch blatant rulebreakers and the only times they "supposedly" ignore situations are usually times when they just don't see it happen, and we can't do anything about it if we don't see it happen. I'm guessing you play TTT, so out of the many times you hear someone claim "rdm", how many times do you physically see the entire situation? Almost never if you're not watching the person specifically. This is just what I see other admins do most of the time and what I do, I definitely pay attention to situations of rule breaking and I hope other admins do too.
  7. The List

    yo wtf is TTT
  8. please half all of scrolls' votes because of this
  9. As stated before, voting for myself
  10. Activity...

    n m p f o o o a r i r e n m t i n g school sux
  11. I'm voting for myself
  12. Stay safe, roux. I have faith you will make it out of this.
  13. No idea how to play this but I'm installing it on mobile
  14. Congrats!
  15. If you kill someone off of a voice chat jihad you wouldn't be able to kill off of sound, this situation only applies if you're only near 1 T and someone just decides to turn on their soundboard. This is indeed micspam as mentioned and is punishable; killing someone off of assuming they have a jihad since someone on the server used a soundboard is not justified. Both sides will be warned as a CT cannot kill someone for an activated jihad unless they are 100% sure it is them (sound cues, etc.) There is a noticeable difference between the sound of an activated jihad and a soundboard jihad, and a good CT should be able to discern the two as long as their voice chat is not very loud.
  16. Congrats!
  17. If there is something happening like this, it's just the action of a bad CT. Misinforming Ts isn't against the rules, and it really just comes down to the ability of the T. Things like: The T's awareness that they are volunteering for an optional deathgame The T's knowledge of not assuming they will get instructions when doing said optional deathgame The T knowing how to play what they signed up for The T's awareness of when a deathgame starts and overall the knowledge of the server. Better knowledge of how the server and its deathgames works will allow you to avoid situations like these on both the CT and T sides, you should know on CT to not misinform Ts as it just adds to the chaos of the server, doing it as a joke is fine but otherwise it's just a dick move.
  18. Elite Supporter.

    Gotta pay 347640₫ omg
  19. Ima solo victory this noobs Does the marriage plugin give points for both CT and T sides? If we have a temporary event like this I would like to see both benefit on T and CT sides so that we don't screw over the CT side again just like when points reset
  20. My idea is that you would get an email after a certain period (1-2 months) that will require your confirmation to continue your subscription, if you don't reply/don't confirm then your subscription will be void. If a kid doesn't check their email, then we know that when they purchase another subscription they are active, and it will prevent them from getting charged over periods of inactivity. I'm saying to keep the auto-renewal but just require a quick confirmation instead of re-buying every time your subscription ends.
  21. Maybe just having a monthly or every 2 month re-confirmation for people's subscriptions so that they can confirm that they are indeed paying for it and know that they are. E-mailing the person can help as if someone goes inactive usually they don't check the forums. I don't think the idea of a one-time payment will work as most people would have to continuously make payments (as I don't think someone would make a payment for a 10 month subscription as people know there are always things that can cause you to not use up your 10 months).
  22. Why not just combine the concepts of servers such like deagle only, one-deag only, awp only, pistol only, etc and make a server which has a bi-monthly/monthly theme of weapons featuring different maps? We could have a large map pool and a continuous cycle of different styles of weapons used will appeal to many different users. RTD can be a "fun" feature for people who just want to have fun, while people could always just not use the plugin if they were trying to be serious.
  23. Can we add awards back? I'm not sure if you guys either deleted them or haven't gotten to it yet, but I miss my awards Also I'm on mobile right now and I can't see the rank titles under people's names, would like if that was added.
×
×
  • Create New...