LegalSmash

Why the hell are you online while camping, don't you have animals and fire and beer, etc?

Hell, he didn't even agree to that, he hasn't made a response yet, but back pedalled and made his own shit up.

No, you are not "officially or unofficially attacked", but rather the time by which you should come up with a real response in a gentlemanly fashion.

Its sick as fuck.

You thought wrong. Its not cute...its about as cute as a disemboweled Venezuelan amputee whore with down synrome.

Its not about removing threads completely, Daze, its the fact that this dense fellow does not see that his shoving a deviance in our faces is as antagonizing and offensive as the general reaction is to him. (and I'm very light on what I consider deviant) His avatar is a picture of a cat or some shit spreadeagled for fisting... wTF

Ahem, (Taps microphone) May it please the Forum, Legalsmash, on behalf of the plaintiffs, persons appalled by this unbearable plague. Let me preface the following by stating that I really don't care about you, or who you are... the only thing I care about is the eradication of this insidious filth that has gripped the vital organs of our beloved gaming community. Regarding your "demands" and "Terms of surrender" First, Hitler (trying to broker a separate peace eh?), there are no terms of surrender, there is no fight, and there is no "need for discussion"... your sig, on its own, is enough to offend most. No Furry discussion, love, sig, tag, etc. is an evenhanded and fair request to your "Terms".... So, if you want that, please, by all means, take down YOUR sig, YOUR avatar, and YOUR pro-sickfuck propoganda, and the rest of the forum will leave you alone. Seriously... no one will tell you "GTFO Furfag" because the rest of us won't care about your personal leanings once its off our screens... get it? Second, Repeat requested information as to what was being discussed... if you imply that requesting information from a neutral arbiter is "inflammatory", I'd tell you to put down your gadget doll and go get a thesaurus, dictionary and read them. If you imply the video is "offensive", I would venture to say that it is no more offensive than your bukkakke like spewing of fur-activity on this forum. Repeats posts do not state ANYTHING NEAR what you said they did... you wildly mis-characterize his statements and give some internet-tough-guy drivel about "he wanna fight..."... lets avoid the fight and establish four main things: 1. No one EVER asked you to bring this "Activity" of yours out... this was YOUR decision solely. A Decision for which you are solely responsible for the reaction, consequence, good or otherwise, in this case bad, to your decision. Deal with it, you are a big boy/girl/wildebeest. 2. No one should be required to accept you, we merely tolerate, tolerance in no way means we as a group, or individually have to stomach you shoving it into our faces like a Hep-C positive San Fransisco tranny because you want to force acceptance. 3. When we mean remove all traces of said activity, we mean ALL, "furry hugs" incident is the equivalent of a soldier in a dont ask dont tell army saying to the platoon he won't tell anyone he's gay, but he'd love to give them all blowjobs in the ammo room. By posting said things, we have an equal right to post the sigs, and related pictures we had. Should you say it "was for your friends", well, the ones posted on the opposing viewpoint were for our own usage and "friends". 4. Either make a relevant, coherent explanation of your position or you know what to do. Y.I.H.

No the rest of them have some sense of "the rest of us don't want to fucking hear it" and leave it to their own circles.

This thread Delivers....

The apologists and enablers in charge.

Now I can sue your bitch ass... personal jurisdiction, pat'na

Its a very unorthodox fetish plaguing the humans in many first world countries where they have an obsession with human-hybrid animals (think ducktales or goof troop characters), except they find these creatures so personally appealing that they believe they are "one of them", secretly if possible, but mostly out loud, much to the dismay of the rest of us. Add to this an often deep felt desire to dress in pieced together animal costumes (see Fursuit), make animal noises as random, generate badly drawn animal/human hybrid pornography (Called "yiff", and it is disturbing) and/or a penchant for other debauched ideas. Normally, I would not give a flying rats ass about someone else's interests or fetish, but furries tend to put it out there in a manner that forces others to comment. When the comments are not exactly to their liking, they go apeshit at you yelling about "Fursecution" and discrimination, often with a tirade of insults claiming you are a racist, "fur-phobe", or other colorful terms. In my opinion, it would not be such an exasperating problem if they were not so greatly offended by people's reaction to their choice of activities. I've seen much stranger and sicker things on the internet, but whereas the "bald Midget BDSM Unicycle riding, paint shitting lesbian hemaprhodite" crowd will either keep to themselves, or shrink away when confronted about public display of said odd shit, the furries will scream, yell, and cry that the "mundanes" (Way to antagonize people who DON'T want to stare at pictures of a water buffalo in a diaper, call them an insulting term...) do not accept them or understand them, and each of them is different and , and and TL,DR. Basically, everything polka said here is completely accurate, sadly however, there is an odd movement seeking to make this perfectly acceptable, rather than rooting it out for the scourge that it really is. There are kids on this website, if a person cant post aforementioned odd pornography, sexually charged images of man-horse-jellyfish hybrids should remain out of bounds as well, or at a minimum, the persons with the interests in question should be required to follow a "don't ask, don't tell' policy to avoid flamewars and other net-shenanigans... In the end, try to cover it up as you wish, but Furry ANYTHING is essentially VERY volatile flame bait.

It matters because its sick, and we cannot sit here and show/talk about twin midget fisting porn or something less intensely disgusting than furries without being persecuted by the Gestapo.

Being the censorship nazis are killing other threads, opinions have to be released somewhere.

Its still legal to physically discipline kids in many states, and in many schools. The problem is that people sue the school, despite the fact that the act of physically disciplining the kid is perfectly legal in their state. The case is eventually dismissed, but school boards are not smart enough to ask for legal fees in return for the expenses in defending themselves from the case brought against them... Here's a key term you should all know to understand why things like parents suing schools for disciplining the student happen: CYOA: Cover Your Own Ass. Basically, the superintendent, the principals, Vice Principals, Teachers and Counselors ALL want to avoid a parent problem where they may end up in court because win or lose, its bad publicity for the school district, and reflects badly on them jointly and severally in the eyes of the general public. As such, these people generally go to great lengths to avoid incurring parental wrath, including passing kids who did not deserve to be passed, giving out inflated grades, and just avoiding disciplining, or in reality teaching a student because the student, in their mind, is less of a danger along with his parent if he just sits in the back and skates through the year to the next teachers classroom and becomes their problem... its almost a cold war "Containment" mentality. Basically, if the legislatures would make it so a parent could only sue a school or teacher for actual abuse of the student, sexual, physical, or emotional, and bar all other cases based on teacher meted discipline, the schools would improve, in my opinion... It also would help if they paid teachers about 1/3 more than they do now, at minimum, so people with actual talent for the job are willing to work the job... honestly, why teach chemistry for 32K a year when you can go work private sector as a chemist, in the least paid job for 55K?

7SyOxKsKCa0

C'mon now, you know that the only vag into that is vag surrounded by a fat body. Are you a pork chaser?

Who remembers this show? I miss Television that had a plot aside from "watch fat blonde complain", anyone else?

I'm telling.

THIS ALONE would have made me buy a portable. LMAO

CeicmehhNvU